 |
|
There is zero gravity at the centre of earth. |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Crystal skulls 'are modern fakes'
Posted on Saturday, May 24, 2008 (CDT) by Isis
Two of the best known crystal skulls - artefacts once thought to be the work of ancient American civilisations - are modern fakes, a scientific study shows. They are the focus of the story in the latest Indiana Jones film. But experts say examples held at the British Museum in London and the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC are anything but genuine. Their results show the skulls were made using tools not available to the ancient Aztecs or Mayans.
Researchers say the work, which is published in the Journal of Archaeological Science, should end decades of speculation over the origins of these controversial objects. A team including Margaret Sax, from the British Museum in London, and Professor Ian Freestone, from Cardiff University, used sophisticated techniques to work out how the two skulls had been made.
"There are about a dozen or more of these crystal skulls. Except for the British Museum skull and one in Paris, they seem to have entered public awareness since the 60s, with the interest in quartz and the New Age movement," Professor Freestone told BBC News. "It does appear that people have been making them since then. Some of them are quite good, but some of them look like they were produced with a Black & Decker in someone's garage."
He added:
"There seems to be the assumption that if it is roughly worked, it is
more likely to have been made by a traditional society. That's untrue
of course, because people were quite sophisticated. They might not have
had modern tools, but they did a good job."
The researchers used an
electron microscope to show that the skulls were probably shaped using
a spinning disc-shaped tool made from copper or another suitable metal.
The craftsman added an abrasive to the wheel, allowing the crystal to be worked more easily.
Modern technology
This "rotary wheel"
technology was almost certainly not used by pre-Columbian peoples.
Instead, analysis of genuine Aztec and Mixtec artefacts show they were
crafted using tools made from stone and wood.
The British Museum skull
was worked with a harsh abrasive such as corundum or diamond. But X-ray
diffraction analysis showed a different material, called carborundum,
was used on the artefact in the Smithsonian.
Carborundum is a synthetic
abrasive which only came into use in the 20th Century: "The suggestion
is that it was made in the 1950s or later," said Professor Freestone.
Who made the skulls is
still a mystery. But, in the case of the British Museum object, some
point the finger of suspicion at a 19th Century French antiquities
dealer called Eugene Boban.
"We assume that he bought
it from, or had it made from [craftsmen] somewhere in Europe," said
Professor Freestone, a former deputy keeper of science and conservation
at the British Museum.
Anonymous donation
Contemporary documents
suggest Mr Boban was involved in selling at least two of the known
crystal skulls - the one held in London and another in Paris.
The London skull was probably manufactured no more than a decade before being offered up for sale.
Despite the findings, a spokeswoman for the British Museum said the artefact would remain on permanent display to the public.
The skull held by the
Smithsonian was donated to the museum anonymously in 1992, along with a
note saying it had been bought in Mexico in 1960.
Nothing is known of its
history before that date, but like the British object, it was probably
manufactured shortly before being purchased.
The researchers were not
able to determine where the quartz used in the skulls was quarried. But
locations with suitably large deposits include Brazil, Madagascar and,
possibly, the Alps.
Professor Freestone said
the work did not prove all crystal skulls were fakes, but it did cast
doubt on the authenticity of other examples: "None of them have a good
archaeological provenance and most appeared suspiciously in the last
decades of the 20th Century. So we have to be sceptical," he explained.
The findings are likely to
be a disappointment to enthusiasts and collectors; the skulls have
become a part of popular culture, appearing in numerous films and
novels.
Copyright: BBC News
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Re: Crystal skulls 'are modern fakes' by cclady on Sunday, May 25, 2008 (CDT) (User Info | Send a Message) | I've been following the story of the crystal skulls for a few years now. I don't completely buy into this updated news. Maybe true, maybe not. Past scientific research on the skulls was not able to determine exactly how they were made ( the Egyptian pyramids come to mind), where they came from or how old they were. Because of the nature of the quartz and the perfection of the sculpture. I also remember reading that it would be extremely difficult to reproduce them today, even with our technology (again, like so many ancient structures which baffle us).
"Professor Freestone said the work did not prove all crystal skulls were fakes....."
A very telling statement.
cc |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Re: Crystal skulls 'are modern fakes' by Kerux on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 (CDT) (User Info | Send a Message) | We are discovering more and more every day that a very advanced civilization inhabited this planet Earth in the ancient past. Just because we don't have any means to move the multi-ton stones used to construct the pyrimids at Giza doesn't mean it did not happen. There have been
stone vases found in Egypt so perfectly carved we can't duplicate them today.
So to say the crystal skulls are fakes because someone assumes no one had the tools to do such a thing in ancient times is the old school of history.
Ask yourself how the Mayans knew that the star Sirus was really three stars? We are just beginning to discover how advanced the ancients were.
Kerux |
Re: Crystal skulls 'are modern fakes' (Score: 1) by cclady on Friday, May 30, 2008 (CDT) (User Info | Send a Message) | Kerux, I completely agree with your statement. Maybe you mistook my original post. Anyway, I just read today that somewhere around Siberia (but that wasn't the country they mentioned) were found 28,000 year old carved flints from mastodon tusks. What confounds scientists is that "their research" concluded that humans were only in that area 13,000 years ago.
I love this stuff!
cc |
]
Re: Crystal skulls 'are modern fakes' (Score: 1) by cclady on Friday, May 30, 2008 (CDT) (User Info | Send a Message) | | Right. See the above story on Beringia. |
]
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |