 |
 |
 |
|
Earth's Moon and Human Evolution
Posted on Monday, August 11, 2008 (CDT) by Thoth
 It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon is not what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet, Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatest thinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewilderment unprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven't you heard about this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysteries have anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could it relate to the suppression of the space programme?
Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size.
However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow.
The eminent
and late scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, had made the
statement, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object." But meaning
here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite -- and
therefore artificial.
Possibly the strongest
evidence for it to be a 'hollow object' comes from the fact that when
meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More
specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the
lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with
the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous
reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect
occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for
over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon?
Two Soviet scientists,
Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, have spent much of their
careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their
conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out
planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy
into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary
mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that
intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.
In 1968 as Apollo 8 moved
into orbit around the Moon, the astronauts spotted a colossal
extraterrestrial object, which then had disappeared on the next orbit.
Photographs were taken, of course, but not released to the public. On
another occasion when the lunar excursion module was down to 4-5 miles
from the Moon's surface astronauts witnessed a UFO suddenly rise from a
crater and rapidly disappear. In 1969, "Buzz" Aldrin was checking the
lunar surface from orbit, when two UFOs appeared, moved towards the
Apollo rocket, hovered nearby, then to Aldrin's utter astonishment the
UFOs joined to form one entity.
Furthermore, astronauts of
Apollo 11 saw a spacefleet of UFOs lined up in a crater. Almost every
Moon mission involved encounters with UFOs or UFO sightings, not to
mention the discovery of many bases on the Moon's surface. Renowned
astronomer Patrick Moore discovered over one hundred dome-like
buildings. In fact, about one thousand such bases, dome-like structures
of diameter around 700 feet, have been witnessed. Astronomy records
extending back 200 years indicate no such artefacts until about the
1950s (remember the book entitledAlternative III?). Many of the UFO
encounters by the astronauts were stated to be of a positive nature in
which unintrusive assistance was given.
It has been found that
asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's
surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as
expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces
of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that
some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal -- which
would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing
conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the
anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick
--mostly metal. Note that mascons (higher concentrations of mass) found
in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been
satisfactorily explained.
Moreover, these structural
anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which
unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by
publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between
them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth.
Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket
exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface---explained away by
NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and
suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon
landing.
The American flag was seen
briefly to wave in... a breeze? But we are told there is no air on the
Moon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the
astronauts clearly drifting in... what? Dust particles do not drift in
vacuum -- they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the
astronauts off the Moon's surface -- were their spacesuits and
backpacks really so heavy? The Moon is supposed to be about one-sixth
the gravity of Earth.
Thus we now know that air
is present, and the feeble rocket exhaust could not be due to a vacuum.
Moreover, the exhaust was apparently too weak to account for the
necessary power to escape from such a gravitational pull in
relationship to the size of the module, which was not large enough to
contain the necessary fuel to escape the Moon's high gravity. Was
antigravity propulsion secretly being used as a booster?
The covert government have
long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity
spacecrafts. They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40
years ago, some larger than the old and massive dirigibles. They seized
the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since then
reverse-engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with
aliens involving antigravity technologies.
The more thorough have been
the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been.
Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like
clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same.
This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal
distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of
5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth,
estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the
solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).
What about the surface of
the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spotted
one of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and
remark, "My God, I don't believe it, look at this ..." Then the
television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extreme
difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the
Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal
shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica,
titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously
found in nature.
Astronomy literature
reports the sighting of a 12-mile bridge-like structure over the Sea of
Crisis in 1954 by John O'Neile, and in the 1950s astronomer Morris K.
Jessup realised that UFOs had bases on the Moon (and so does the
government of course). Other strange lunar phenomena are: the
observation by Dr. Frank Harris of a black body on the surface, 250
miles long and 50 miles wide; clouds and lightning; strange moving
shadows and objects, and spire-like structures thousands of feet high;
a huge boulder with tracks (behind it) from inside a crater to the rim
(uphill); the shrinking, over a period of time, of the crater Luna from
six miles in diameter to one and a half miles; 'hill' effects in
craters appearing and disappearing in a few hours; over 800 substantial
observations made by scientists of blinking and flashing lights; the
results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface, indicating several
large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances,
massive girders, machinery and some 1000 kilometre blocks of metal,
alongside tears in the surface. This reveals massive subsurface
interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavating
equipment.
Professional astronomers
have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations,
referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean
observations are now only of interest to the amateur.
Our satellite has long
since been established as being extremely dry but this information has
been contradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one
occasion a cloud of water vapour appeared covering more than 100 square
miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear at lightning
speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by
the Earth was once favoured but the circular orbit of the Moon
invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is the wrong size and in
the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate
relative to Earth; the same side always faces the Earth. And what about
the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipse phenomenon. The position and
size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc.
Scientific experts,
including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow -- it is
the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase
with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation
through rock substance.
'Spaceship Moon' is the
brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the
theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University
physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a
significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.
It might be worth a comment
on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went
to the Moon. DVDs and television programmes have proffered that, in
particular, photographs allegedly taken on the Moon were faked. In fact
one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of objects on
the Moon were not parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by
the Sun, rather than by studio lighting. Further evidence has been
given. But we may know from earlier suspicions that NASA has a
propensity for faking scenes -- for example, the view of the interior
of the shuttle faking an outer-space mission when actually on the
ground. Thus the conclusion, and personal opinion of the author, is
that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon, and
NASA has produced faked photographs.
Was the space programme cut
because further encounters with UFOs might blow the government
cover-up? Even more important than this, allowing the public to
increase their confront and interest in the subject of
Extraterrestrials would eventually lead to a worldwide awakening of the
human race's true heritage, the causes of our downfall, the
falsification of our history, and ultimately the disclosure and
eradication of the control mechanism.
We see that the Moon
mysteries are intimately bound up with extraterrestrial sightings and
involvement, in particular, the conclusion of the two Russian
scientists that the Moon is artificial and hollow. Is this a favourable
omen for the human race or a harbinger of something more ominous. Why
was the Moon directed to retain continuously a dark side? A side of the
Moon we never see. Also police records referring to increased crime
during the full Moon are commonplace. A study of ET material of which
literature today abounds, strongly indicates that the nature of the
Moon has a sinister purpose and plays a role in manipulating man's
evolution.
Copyright: The Canadian National Newspaper
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
